Home

News

Calendar

About CEGSA
    Membership
    Sponsors

   Committee

Conference 2008

Awards
    2006

    2007

DIGITAL WORLD

RamPage
     Archive

IT Revision Guides

Events

Laptop scheme

Senior Secondary IT

Workshops
     Presenters Info


Site Administration
Contact us 
Sandpit 
Help 


 

 

 

the 'Digital Education Revolution'

Show Menu

Part 1

Download a copy of the new federal government's plan for its 'PDFimage.jpgDigital Education Revolution'
15 pages 830kb

 

Some key points from the secondary school plan

"Information and communications technology is no longer just another subject taught by schools, it is a means of learning across all subjects – from English, mathematics and science, to the humanities,
technical and applied studies, music and visual arts." p3

... a computer for every student from year 9 to year 12... 

"Schools will be able to apply for grants up to $1 million to revolutionise their classrooms with new or upgraded ICT equipment. This could include personal laptops, thin clients with virtual desktops, and internet network infrastructure to plug our schools into the information superhighway."

gillard.jpgJulia Gillard on Radio 891 21/2/08 on "computer on every desk" issue.

 FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS National Secondary School Computer Fund 
2007-08
$100m
2008-09
$400m
2009-10
$300m
2010-11
$200m


Part 2  Tax refund for home computers, internet etc.

"Under Labor’s Education Tax Refund, eligible parents will be able to claim: [ALP Tax Policy - scroll down]

  • A 50 per cent refund every year for up to $750 of education expenses for each child attending primary school (maximum $375 per child, per year).
  • A 50 per cent refund every year for up to $1,500 of education expenses for each child attending secondary school (maximum $750 per child, per year).
  • Therefore a typical family with a primary school aged child and a secondary school aged child would receive a tax refund of up to $1,125 per year.
Your Comments please: will it work? what impact will it have on schools?

(click Comments at bottom of the page: please include your name) 


Comments:

From jtravers - 1/23/08 11:17 AM

Chris Bennie's little boy is typical of children with enlightened and well informed parents, but sadly, not of the whole population. The results of the recently published national ict skills assessment suggest that while a lot of students are skilled, an awful lot are not. I have written a little report on this assessment in my blog.

Educators have a long and sad tradition of resisting change under the name of protecting traditional standards, but I think it is frequently just inertia.  

From cbennie - 12/4/07 10:02 PM

I want this to work....I really do.  I don't want to be a na-sayer, negative or anti-government.  So I am looking for the positives.  The fact that this has thrust ICT back into the political spotlight is a HUGE bonus - something which seems to have not occured over the last few years at both a state and federal level.  ICT had become 'taken for granted' and therefore not a political vote winner.  Whether (I) we agree with this new plan, the fact that it's out there and opens up debate is a bonus.  Hopefully it will have a flow on effect at the state level.  Hopefully it will also have a flow on at the chalkface and make some more reticent Principal's/school think a bit more carefully about how ICT is implemented and addressed in their sites.

I like the fact that it is centred around laptops - sure I worry about the complexities that laptops bring or more to the point - that these complexities won't be addressed/allowed for by the politicians and potentialy schools - henceforth setting this up for failure before it begins.  I worry where this will leave schools in 5 years time when these laptops will need to be rolled over and the funds have (possibly) dried up.  And of course I worry that thin boxes of plastic, LCD and logic boards will be put into sites with no infrastructure, PD, just in time support etc.

History tells us that merely dumping machines in sites does not work - but all of us who are reading this discussion already know this.......

My son - at the age of three, can now turn on our home computer, load Safari, click on the Thomas the Tank Engine website and manouver around the site...without ANY help what-so-ever - and we're starting the revolution in Year 9?

But I'm looking for the positives in this Revolution.....

  

From jtravers - 12/4/07 3:22 PM

Well, it's gunna happen, one way or the other. A commitment to 'put a computer on every student's desk'. When the subsidy for home computers is added, it is realistic to forsee a dramatic increase in student access to computers over the next few years. That fact of itself will have a big impact. Virtually every white-collar worker in Australia now uses a computer as a basic work tool. It is passing strange that students who'se main activity is the getting and processing of information generally have access to a computer for maybe two hours a week at school. The same students probably average four or five times as much computer access at home.

John T 

From russell - 12/3/07 12:34 PM

In addition...many schools have a self imposed limit on the student:computer ratio.  They understand full well that the "computer networked system" is much more that just computers and requires technical support, consumable costs, infrastructure etc.  My rudimentary calculations indicate that the cost for schools and state jurisdictions of implementing the new  federal governments ICT Digital Education Revolution (hardware/bandwidth plan) would be more than 6 times what they are putting in.  Some common sense should prevail...surely!

From russell - 11/29/07 10:46 AM

It should be noted that this is not new money and was already earmarked by the liberal govt for ICT in schools grants.  So if the measure of the impact was improved student learning outcomes, then  I don’t think the provision of a different suite of hardware will impact differently.  If impact is measured by the ability of schools to sustain the level of ICT beyond the program then I don’t think it will be achieved especially if the policy directions change at the next election.  The tokenistic throwing of this amount of money directly to schools on just hardware does not constitute sound policy and is ignorant of the differing ICT needs of each state and territory.  Also. analysis of ICT programs in the past indicate that greatest impact can be achieved when all aspects of ICT for learning in schools is considered concurrently i.e. technical support, ICT pedagogy & teacher professional development, infrastructure, bandwidth, digital content,  local use policy, curriculum, software, central services etc.   Strategic plans for each of the different state public and private jurisdictions have varying degrees of emphasis and not all have been guided by the MCEETYA Learning In and Online World’ national action plan for ICT education.    This money could be much more wisely spent through higher levels of collaboration between the states, territories and the federal government so that the gaps in each of the states strategic plans can be addressed and existing state govt services can be leveraged on.  The overall result would be a smoothing of outcomes and impacts across the country.  The provision of direct grants to schools also has much inefficiency in terms of social equity. For example those schools which are currently undergoing significant change or through lack of executive strategic planning (eg high Principal turnover) may not have the resources available in order to successfully apply for these grants and could will miss out. Now that we have similar parties in government at both state and federal level, you would like to think that a much higher level of collaboration to achieve a common end (improved learning outcomes though ICTs) will be more attainable. The plan also does not mention interactive whiteboards which is an indication of limited thinking.

From jtravers - 11/29/07 8:55 AM

They say that the deal includes 'fibre to the premises' (where this is possible I presume, not remote areas) so I guess this takes care of the bandwidth issue.

You're right Peter that it is not in itself a revolution: that depends on the chalkies and the chalkie-leaders.  

Does the home computer subsidy mean that he digital-divide will end or at least shrink significantly? 

From ppagonis - 11/28/07 10:42 PM

Interesting digital revolution where only secondary students take part also check out the band width they suggest will be needed to make it work. They must be dreaming.

From pruwoldt - 11/28/07 5:35 PM

There are a number of levels that one could respond to this.

Infrastructure and logistics - it seems obvious that the way to go would be notebook size machines with wireless networking.  The powerpoints problem alone creates issues.  I wonder if the money allocated will actually provide for what they are hoping for because the additional strain of the network and also the pipe to the internet will also have to be taken into consideration.

Revolution - schools are huge organisations that are slow in reaction time and difficult to change direction.  Their industrial era culture is embedded so strongly.  I have posted several blog entries about this issue but particularly like the ideas of  Geetha Narayanan

 This proposal does not fit my criteria for being called revolution.  A step in the right direction maybe.

 

From jtravers - 11/27/07 9:06 PM

Good point Chris Bennie about primary schools, but a partial answer might be in the Part 2 I have added tonight, the subsidy for home computers by parents. This will go a considerable way to make computers and internet access more affordable to families with children. Interesting that this initiative costs more than twice as much as the $1b for secondary computers.

John T 

From edwardps - 11/26/07 8:52 PM

From Merri James

I think this is a huge step in the right direction but it doesn't go far enough. The digital natives are also sitting in our primary schools and they need access to computers and other ICTs as well! This also has enormous implications for school infrastructures, the very least of which is classroom size, design and layout. The numbers of children in our classes is also a big issue, especially when we consider that students are demanding immediate feedback (which they currently get from a computer screen or video game). I like the fact that the Labor party are initiating the Education Revolution but in its present form I feel that it is too simplistic. Hopefully, now that they have won the election, we'll be able to influence the way in which ICTs are incorporated into our schools.

From cbennie - 11/26/07 12:31 PM

OK - I'll bite.......Where's the Digital Education Revolution for the Primary Level?   

From graham - 11/25/07 3:00 PM

This policy represents a momentous opportunity for students and the profession. Every teacher must be provided with a laptop and opportunity to acquire the requisite skills. Input is needed of the provision of teacher training in ICT because that is the really hard bit. I believe teachers learn best from teachers and in school contexts and the success of the LTI program in DECS is testament to that. It would be great if CEGSA were able to offer some of this training across the sectors. What do others think?

Graham Taylor; CEGSA PD Convenor 

From jtravers - 11/25/07 2:55 PM

I am amazed that this policy did not get more attention, but maybe it got buried under the truckloads of money and policies. Anyway, it looks to me like an initiative that will have a major impact on secondary schools, and because of this, on primary too. If access to a computer becomes the norm rather than an occasional event at school, then teachers surely will use them much more in their teaching. Not all the teaching will necessarily be creative or reformist, but will surely have an impact. Even greater use of humble word processing will have a significant impact.

John T 



Last Modified 2/22/08 8:39 AM